Curated RSS Brief
The logic of the racist Supreme Court isn’t adding up
Policy Close Policy Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. Follow Follow See All Policy Law Close Law Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. Follow Follow See All Law The logic of the racist Supreme Court isn’t adding up The court’s dismantling of the Voting Rights Act disregards some obvious math. The court’s dismantling of the Voting Rights Act disregards some obvious math. by Sarah Jeong Close Sarah Jeong Features Editor Posts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. Follow Follow See All by Sarah Jeong Apr 30, 2026, 7:52 PM UTC Link Share Gift Illustration by Cath Virginia / The Verge | Photos via Getty Images Sarah Jeong Close Sarah Jeong Posts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. Follow Follow See All by Sarah Jeong is a reporter who writes about law, technology, speech, and democracy. A journalist trained as a lawyer, she has been writing about tech for 10 years. Close watchers of the Supreme Court knew that the conservative supermajority was about to murder what was left of the Voting Rights Act . Wednesday’s decision in Louisiana v. Callais took down Section 2 of the law, clearing the way for racist gerrymandering, because it is now racist to remedy racism . The decision is an affront to the history of the Voting Rights Act, an affront to the history of the United States, and an affront to math. The state of Louisiana, which is around 30 percent Black, has six districts. The voting districts are drawn so that there are two majority-Black districts. That is two out of six districts; approximately 33 percent of the districts, you might say. Because SCOTUS has ruled this map unconstitutional, the state of Louisiana will almost certainly redraw the maps so there is only one majority-Black district. So a statewide population of 30 percent will now have their voting preferences reflected in 17 percent of the state’s districts. Theoretically, voting is more subtle than race. Many different things at municipal, state, and federal levels appear on any given ballot; no racial minority is a monolith, and a community will reflect a rich variety of social and political views. But possibly because modern-day Republicans are incapable of toning down the racism, around 83 percent of Black American voters identify as Democrats — this is especially understandable in Southern states like Louisiana, an insurrectionist state readmitted to the Union in 1868 after being forced to fix its bullshit by a civil war that killed somewhere around 750,000 Americans. Related Some patriotic reflections on Independence Day A vote for Donald Trump is a vote for school shootings and measles The war on DEI is a smoke screen The provisions of the Voting Rights Act addressing racial discrimination did not come about in a colorblind vacuum, because the history of the United States is not colorblind. The Civil War, Civil Rights Movement, VRA, affirmative action — all of these things are part of a long struggle to correct the broken math of our society. 33 percent is not the same as 30 percent, but it’s a damn sight closer to it than 17 is. The VRA’s Section 2 was part of a vast, interlocking project to get us closer to 1 = 1. From the signing of the Constitution, the math simply did not add up. States were given proportional electoral power based on their populations, but the same human beings that added numbers to the Electoral College were not eligible to vote. And in the slaveholding South, it got even worse — each enslaved Black American was counted as three-fifths of a person, and none of them were allowed to vote. But the founders figured things evened out since the composition of the Senate, which doesn’t reflect population at all, favored the non-slaveholding states. (Today, we are still held hostage by this miserable math, where 575,000 Wyomingites have the same number of Senate votes as 39 million Californians.) Even after the Civil War and the Reconstruction Amendments, racist-controlled Southern states kept designing systems like poll taxes, voting tests, and grandfather provisions to block the Black vote. The Voting Rights Act of 1965 took a heavy hand to these repeat offenders. The United States sees clear racial disparities in generational wealth, educational outcomes, average income, life expectancy, and infant mortality — disparities that are heightened by unequal representation in government. The Civil Rights Movement sought to fix these disparities on many fronts, tinkering with the interlocking systems that generated these bad numbers. The conservative backlash to civil rights was a bootlicking defense of the status quo — instead of updating a buggy system, they’d rather reinvent race science to keep things exactly the way they are. For a brief window in time, a progressive SCOTUS was aligned with the Civil Rights Movement, building a body
- Policy Close Policy Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.
- Follow Follow See All Policy Law Close Law Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.
- Follow Follow See All Law The logic of the racist Supreme Court isn’t adding up The court’s dismantling of the Voting Rights Act disregards some obvious math.
- The court’s dismantling of the Voting Rights Act disregards some obvious math.
If you want the exact wording, examples, or full context from the publisher, open the original source article.
Open Original Article
Comments
Post a Comment